From Real Exams Quiz

Secondary 4 History Conflict International Relations Quiz

Free Exam-Derived DeepSeek V4 Pro Secondary 4 History Conflict International Relations quiz with questions and answers for Singapore students. This page is rendered as a direct URL so the questions and answers can be discovered without pressing in-page buttons.

These static practice materials are generated from the site's syllabus and paper-generation workflow, with source and model context shown so students and parents can evaluate the material before use.

Secondary 4 History From Real Exams Generated by DeepSeek V4 Pro Updated 2026-06-03

Questions

<!-- TuitionGoWhere generation metadata: stage=3-0; model=deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro; model_label=DeepSeek V4 Pro; generated=2026-05-29; Sources: Stage 2-1 real exam-derived templates and Stage 2-2 exam-enriched syllabus. -->

Secondary 4 History Quiz - Conflict International Relations

Name: _________________________ Class: _________________________ Date: _________________________ Score: ______ / 50

Duration: 45 minutes Total Marks: 50

Instructions:

  • This quiz contains 20 questions on Conflict and International Relations.
  • Answer ALL questions in the spaces provided.
  • Marks for each question are indicated in brackets.
  • For source-based questions, study the sources carefully before answering.
  • Use your own knowledge where required.

Section A: Source-Based Questions (20 marks)

Study Sources A, B, and C carefully, and then answer Questions 1–5.

Source A: A speech by US President Harry Truman to Congress, March 1947, requesting aid for Greece and Turkey.

"I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures. I believe that we must assist free peoples to work out their own destinies in their own way."

Source B: A cartoon published in a British newspaper, 1948, titled "The Marshall Plan." It shows Uncle Sam offering a large bag labelled "US Dollars" to a line of European figures standing beside ruined buildings.

Source C: An extract from a Soviet newspaper, Pravda, 1949, commenting on the Marshall Plan.

"The so-called Marshall Plan is nothing more than a scheme for American economic domination of Europe. It is a tool to enslave European nations and make them dependent on Wall Street."


1. Study Source A. What is the message of this source? Explain your answer, using details from the source. [5 marks]


2. Study Source B. How does this cartoon support the message of Source A? Explain your answer. [4 marks]


3. Study Source C. How different is the view expressed in Source C from the view expressed in Source A? Explain your answer, using details from both sources. [5 marks]


4. Study Sources A and C. Does Source C make you surprised by what was being said in Source A? Explain your answer. [6 marks]


5. Study Source B. What can you infer about the purpose of the Marshall Plan from this cartoon? Explain your answer. [5 marks]


Section B: Structured Response Questions (18 marks)

Answer Questions 6–10 in the spaces provided.

6. Explain why the United States adopted the policy of containment after World War II. [6 marks]


7. Explain how the Berlin Blockade (1948–1949) contributed to Cold War tensions. [4 marks]


8. Explain why the Soviet Union established the Warsaw Pact in 1955. [4 marks]


9. Explain how the arms race affected relations between the USA and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. [4 marks]


10. Explain why the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 is considered a turning point in the Cold War. [5 marks]


Section C: Essay Question (12 marks)

Answer Question 11 in the space provided. You are advised to spend about 20 minutes on this question.

11. "The Cold War was caused entirely by Soviet expansionism." How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. [12 marks]


Section D: Additional Structured Questions (10 marks)

Answer Questions 12–16 in the spaces provided.

12. What was the significance of the Yalta Conference (1945) in shaping post-war Europe? [2 marks]


13. Explain one reason why the Korean War (1950–1953) is considered a proxy war. [2 marks]


14. How did the formation of NATO in 1949 increase Cold War tensions? [2 marks]


15. Explain one effect of the Vietnam War on US foreign policy during the Cold War. [2 marks]


16. What role did the United Nations play in the Suez Crisis of 1956? [2 marks]


Section E: Knowledge and Understanding Questions (10 marks)

Answer Questions 17–20 in the spaces provided.

17. Define the term "Iron Curtain" as used by Winston Churchill in 1946. [2 marks]


18. Identify two countries that were members of the Warsaw Pact. [2 marks]


19. State one consequence of the nuclear arms race for international relations. [2 marks]


20. Name the policy introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev that contributed to the end of the Cold War, and briefly explain its impact. [4 marks]


END OF QUIZ

Answers

<!-- TuitionGoWhere generation metadata: stage=3-0; model=deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro; model_label=DeepSeek V4 Pro; generated=2026-05-29; Sources: Stage 2-1 real exam-derived templates and Stage 2-2 exam-enriched syllabus. -->

Secondary 4 History Quiz - Conflict International Relations

ANSWER KEY AND MARKING SCHEME

Total Marks: 50


Section A: Source-Based Questions (20 marks)

Question 1 (5 marks)

Study Source A. What is the message of this source? Explain your answer, using details from the source.

Answer Framework: The message of Source A is that the United States is committed to supporting countries threatened by communism/Soviet expansion. Truman argues that the US must help "free peoples" resist "subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures" — the "armed minorities" referring to communist insurgents and "outside pressures" referring to the Soviet Union. The message reflects the Truman Doctrine: the US would provide military and economic aid to prevent the spread of communism.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Identifies a basic message without explanation or source detail. E.g., "The US wants to help other countries."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Identifies the message with some explanation and reference to the source. E.g., "The message is that the US will support free peoples against communism, as Truman says they must resist subjugation."
  • L3 (5 marks): Fully explains the message with specific source details and contextual understanding. E.g., "The message is that the US is adopting a policy of containment against Soviet expansion. Truman refers to 'armed minorities' (communist rebels) and 'outside pressures' (the Soviet Union), showing the US will intervene to protect 'free peoples' — this is the Truman Doctrine in action."

Question 2 (4 marks)

Study Source B. How does this cartoon support the message of Source A? Explain your answer.

Answer Framework: The cartoon supports Source A's message by showing the US providing economic aid (the "US Dollars" bag) to European countries (the figures beside ruined buildings). This aligns with Truman's declaration that the US must "assist free peoples" — the cartoon visualises this assistance through the Marshall Plan. The ruined buildings represent war-devastated Europe, and Uncle Sam (representing the US) is actively helping, demonstrating the US commitment Truman described.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Identifies a basic link without explanation. E.g., "Both show the US helping Europe."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains how the cartoon supports Source A with specific details from both sources. E.g., "The cartoon shows Uncle Sam offering dollars to Europeans beside ruined buildings, which supports Truman's message that the US must 'assist free peoples' — the Marshall Plan is the practical implementation of the Truman Doctrine."

Question 3 (5 marks)

Study Source C. How different is the view expressed in Source C from the view expressed in Source A? Explain your answer, using details from both sources.

Answer Framework: The views are fundamentally different. Source A presents US aid as benevolent support for "free peoples" resisting oppression. Source C presents the same aid (Marshall Plan) as "American economic domination" and a "tool to enslave European nations." While Source A frames US policy as protective and altruistic, Source C frames it as exploitative and imperialistic. The difference reflects the ideological divide: the US saw itself as defending freedom; the USSR saw US actions as capitalist expansion.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Identifies a basic difference without explanation. E.g., "Source A is positive, Source C is negative."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains the difference with some reference to both sources. E.g., "Source A says the US helps free peoples, but Source C says the US wants to dominate Europe."
  • L3 (5 marks): Fully explains the difference with specific details from both sources and contextual understanding. E.g., "Source A presents US aid as supporting 'free peoples' against 'subjugation,' while Source C calls it 'American economic domination' and a 'tool to enslave European nations.' The sources offer completely opposing interpretations of the same policy — one as liberation, the other as exploitation."

Question 4 (6 marks)

Study Sources A and C. Does Source C make you surprised by what was being said in Source A? Explain your answer.

Answer Framework: No, Source C does not make me surprised by Source A. Source A is a US presidential speech promoting the Truman Doctrine — it is expected that the US would present its policies as benevolent and defensive. Source C is from Pravda, a Soviet state-controlled newspaper — it is expected that the USSR would condemn US policies as imperialistic. Given the Cold War context, both sources reflect predictable propaganda positions: each superpower portrayed its own actions as defensive and the other's as aggressive. The contrast is exactly what one would expect from opposing sides in an ideological conflict.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): States surprise/not surprised without explanation. E.g., "I am not surprised because they are from different countries."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains with reference to source content and some context. E.g., "I am not surprised because Source A is a US speech promoting its policy, while Source C is Soviet propaganda criticising the US."
  • L3 (5-6 marks): Fully explains with specific source details, source provenance, and Cold War context. E.g., "I am not surprised. Source A is a Truman speech to Congress — it is expected that a US president would justify policy as defending 'free peoples.' Source C is from Pravda, a Soviet state newspaper — it is expected to condemn US actions as 'economic domination.' In the Cold War, both sides used propaganda to portray themselves as defensive and the other as aggressive. The opposing views are entirely predictable given the sources' origins and the ideological conflict."

Question 5 (5 marks)

Study Source B. What can you infer about the purpose of the Marshall Plan from this cartoon? Explain your answer.

Answer Framework: From the cartoon, I can infer that the purpose of the Marshall Plan was to provide economic aid to rebuild war-torn Europe and prevent the spread of communism. Uncle Sam offering a bag of "US Dollars" to Europeans standing beside ruined buildings suggests the US aimed to help European nations recover economically. By providing financial assistance, the US hoped to create stable, prosperous democracies that would be less vulnerable to communist influence. The cartoon implies the Marshall Plan was a tool of containment, using economic means to strengthen "free peoples" against Soviet expansion.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Identifies a basic purpose without explanation. E.g., "The purpose was to give money to Europe."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains the purpose with some reference to the cartoon. E.g., "The cartoon shows the US giving dollars to help Europe rebuild, so the purpose was economic aid to prevent communism."
  • L3 (5 marks): Fully explains the inferred purpose with specific cartoon details and contextual understanding. E.g., "The cartoon infers the Marshall Plan aimed to rebuild European economies to prevent communist expansion. Uncle Sam offering dollars to figures beside ruined buildings shows the US providing aid for reconstruction. By restoring economic stability, the US sought to strengthen democratic governments and reduce the appeal of communism, making the Marshall Plan a key part of containment policy."

Section B: Structured Response Questions (18 marks)

Question 6 (6 marks)

Explain why the United States adopted the policy of containment after World War II.

Answer Framework: The US adopted containment for several reasons:

  1. Fear of Soviet expansion: The USSR had installed communist governments in Eastern Europe (Poland, Czechoslovakia, etc.) and was supporting communist movements in Greece and Turkey. The US feared further expansion.
  2. Ideological opposition to communism: The US was committed to defending democracy and capitalism against the spread of communism, which it viewed as a threat to freedom and economic prosperity.
  3. Lessons from appeasement: The experience of the 1930s, where appeasement failed to stop Nazi aggression, convinced US policymakers that Soviet expansion had to be confronted early.
  4. Truman Doctrine (1947): This formalised the policy, pledging US support to "free peoples" resisting subjugation, beginning with aid to Greece and Turkey.
  5. Marshall Plan (1948): Economic aid to rebuild Western Europe was a key part of containment, aiming to create stable democracies less susceptible to communist influence.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Simple or generalised reasons. E.g., "The US was afraid of the Soviet Union."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains one or two reasons with some detail. E.g., "The US adopted containment because the USSR was expanding into Eastern Europe and the US wanted to stop communism."
  • L3 (5-6 marks): Explains multiple reasons with specific examples and clear links to containment. E.g., "The US adopted containment due to Soviet expansion in Eastern Europe, ideological opposition to communism, and the lessons of appeasement. The Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan were key implementations, providing military and economic aid to prevent the spread of Soviet influence."

Question 7 (4 marks)

Explain how the Berlin Blockade (1948–1949) contributed to Cold War tensions.

Answer Framework: The Berlin Blockade increased Cold War tensions because:

  • Stalin blocked all land and water routes into West Berlin in an attempt to force the Western Allies out of the city, challenging their commitment to defending West Berlin.
  • The Western Allies responded with the Berlin Airlift, supplying the city by air for almost a year, demonstrating their determination to resist Soviet pressure.
  • The crisis solidified the division of Germany and Berlin, leading to the formal creation of West Germany (FRG) and East Germany (GDR) in 1949.
  • It confirmed the failure of cooperation between the former wartime allies and deepened mutual suspicion, making the Cold War more entrenched.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Simple or generalised explanation. E.g., "It made the USA and USSR more angry with each other."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains the contribution to tensions with specific details. E.g., "The Blockade led to the Berlin Airlift, which showed the US would not abandon West Berlin. This deepened the division of Germany and increased mistrust between the superpowers."

Question 8 (4 marks)

Explain why the Soviet Union established the Warsaw Pact in 1955.

Answer Framework: The Soviet Union established the Warsaw Pact for the following reasons:

  • Response to NATO: The inclusion of West Germany in NATO in 1955 was seen as a direct threat by the USSR. The Warsaw Pact was a counter-alliance to balance NATO's military power in Europe.
  • Control over Eastern Europe: The Pact formalised Soviet military control over its satellite states, ensuring their armies were integrated under Soviet command and preventing any defection from the communist bloc.
  • Propaganda and legitimacy: It provided a framework to portray Soviet dominance as a mutual defence arrangement among equal socialist states, countering Western claims of Soviet imperialism.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Simple or generalised reason. E.g., "Because of NATO."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains reasons with specific context. E.g., "The USSR formed the Warsaw Pact in response to West Germany joining NATO, which it saw as a threat. It also allowed the USSR to maintain tight control over Eastern European armies."

Question 9 (4 marks)

Explain how the arms race affected relations between the USA and the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Answer Framework: The arms race affected relations by:

  • Increasing mutual fear and suspicion: The development of nuclear weapons by both sides created a climate of constant threat, where each side feared a surprise attack.
  • Raising the stakes of conflict: The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) meant that any direct conflict could lead to total annihilation, making both sides extremely cautious but also heightening tensions.
  • Draining resources: Massive military spending fuelled competition and mistrust, as each side interpreted the other's weapons development as aggressive intentions.
  • Driving proxy conflicts: The arms race extended to conventional weapons and regional alliances, intensifying conflicts in areas like Korea and Vietnam as both superpowers armed their allies.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Simple or generalised effect. E.g., "It made them compete more."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains effects with specific concepts. E.g., "The arms race created a balance of terror through MAD, which prevented direct war but increased fear and suspicion. It also led to massive military spending and fuelled proxy wars."

Question 10 (5 marks)

Explain why the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 is considered a turning point in the Cold War.

Answer Framework: The Cuban Missile Crisis is considered a turning point because:

  • Closest point to nuclear war: The world came closer to nuclear conflict than at any other time, shocking both superpowers into recognising the need for better communication and crisis management.
  • Improved communication: The crisis led to the establishment of the Moscow-Washington hotline in 1963, allowing direct communication between leaders to prevent future misunderstandings.
  • Shift towards détente: Both sides became more willing to negotiate, leading to the Partial Test Ban Treaty (1963) and later arms control agreements, marking a move from pure confrontation to limited cooperation.
  • Changed leadership perceptions: Kennedy and Khrushchev both realised the dangers of brinkmanship, leading to more cautious policies in subsequent years.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Simple or generalised reason. E.g., "It almost caused a nuclear war."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Explains one or two reasons with some detail. E.g., "It was a turning point because it led to the hotline and test ban treaty, showing both sides wanted to avoid war."
  • L3 (5 marks): Fully explains multiple reasons with specific outcomes and the shift towards détente. E.g., "The crisis was a turning point because it brought the world to the brink of nuclear war, prompting the establishment of the hotline and the Partial Test Ban Treaty. It marked the beginning of a shift towards détente, as both superpowers recognised the need to manage their rivalry more carefully."

Section C: Essay Question (12 marks)

Question 11 (12 marks)

"The Cold War was caused entirely by Soviet expansionism." How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.

Answer Framework: Candidates should present a balanced argument, evaluating the role of Soviet expansionism alongside other factors.

Arguments supporting the statement (Soviet responsibility):

  • Soviet imposition of communist regimes in Eastern Europe (Poland, Czechoslovakia, etc.) violated wartime agreements (e.g., Yalta Declaration on Liberated Europe).
  • Soviet support for communist insurgencies in Greece and Turkey threatened Western interests and prompted the Truman Doctrine.
  • The Berlin Blockade (1948–1949) was an aggressive attempt to force the West out of Berlin.
  • Soviet development of nuclear weapons and the arms race contributed to tensions.

Arguments against the statement (other causes):

  • US actions and policies: The Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan were seen by the USSR as aggressive attempts to encircle and weaken the Soviet Union. The US use of the atomic bomb on Japan (1945) was partly intended to intimidate the USSR.
  • Mutual misunderstanding and fear: Both sides misinterpreted each other's defensive actions as offensive. The security dilemma meant that actions taken for self-defence (e.g., NATO) were seen as threats by the other side.
  • Ideological conflict: The fundamental clash between capitalism and communism made conflict almost inevitable, regardless of specific actions.
  • Long-term factors: The Cold War had roots in the Russian Revolution (1917) and Western intervention in the Russian Civil War, creating decades of mistrust.

Conclusion: While Soviet expansionism was a major cause, it was not the sole cause. The Cold War resulted from a complex interaction of Soviet actions, US policies, mutual misperceptions, and deep ideological differences. A balanced judgement should acknowledge Soviet responsibility while recognising the role of other factors.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-3 marks): One-sided or simplistic answer. E.g., "Yes, the USSR caused the Cold War by taking over Eastern Europe."
  • L2 (4-6 marks): Describes some causes but lacks analysis or balance. E.g., "The USSR caused it by expanding, but the US also had policies like the Truman Doctrine."
  • L3 (7-9 marks): Explains both sides with some analysis and examples. E.g., "Soviet expansionism was important, but US actions like the Marshall Plan and mutual fear also contributed."
  • L4 (10-12 marks): Balanced, analytical answer with specific examples and a well-supported judgement. E.g., "While Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe was a key trigger, the Cold War was not caused entirely by the USSR. US policies, ideological conflict, and the security dilemma all played significant roles. The Cold War was the result of a complex interplay of factors, not the fault of one side alone."

Section D: Additional Structured Questions (10 marks)

Question 12 (2 marks)

What was the significance of the Yalta Conference (1945) in shaping post-war Europe?

Answer Framework: The Yalta Conference was significant because it decided the division of Germany into occupation zones, agreed on the establishment of the United Nations, and included a declaration on liberated Europe promising free elections (which the USSR later violated). It laid the groundwork for post-war spheres of influence.

Marking Scheme:

  • 1 mark: Identifies one significant outcome. E.g., "It divided Germany."
  • 2 marks: Explains the significance with context. E.g., "Yalta divided Germany into zones and promised free elections in Eastern Europe, but the USSR's failure to honour this led to the division of Europe."

Question 13 (2 marks)

Explain one reason why the Korean War (1950–1953) is considered a proxy war.

Answer Framework: The Korean War is considered a proxy war because it was fought between North Korea (supported by the USSR and China) and South Korea (supported by the US and UN forces), with the superpowers using the local conflict to advance their own interests without directly fighting each other.

Marking Scheme:

  • 1 mark: Identifies a basic reason. E.g., "Because the US and USSR supported different sides."
  • 2 marks: Explains the proxy nature with specific details. E.g., "The USSR and China provided military aid to North Korea, while the US led UN forces supporting South Korea, making it a conflict where superpowers fought through local allies."

Question 14 (2 marks)

How did the formation of NATO in 1949 increase Cold War tensions?

Answer Framework: NATO increased tensions because it was a military alliance of Western powers that the USSR perceived as an aggressive encirclement. It formalised the US commitment to defend Western Europe, directly challenging Soviet influence and leading to the creation of the Warsaw Pact in 1955.

Marking Scheme:

  • 1 mark: Identifies a basic effect. E.g., "It made the USSR feel threatened."
  • 2 marks: Explains the link to increased tensions. E.g., "NATO was seen by the USSR as a hostile alliance aimed at containing Soviet power, which deepened mistrust and prompted the formation of the Warsaw Pact."

Question 15 (2 marks)

Explain one effect of the Vietnam War on US foreign policy during the Cold War.

Answer Framework: One effect was the adoption of the Nixon Doctrine, where the US reduced direct military involvement and instead provided aid and training to allied nations to fight their own wars ("Vietnamisation"). This reflected a reluctance to commit US troops to large-scale conflicts after the costly failure in Vietnam.

Marking Scheme:

  • 1 mark: Identifies an effect. E.g., "The US became less willing to send troops."
  • 2 marks: Explains the effect with context. E.g., "The Vietnam War led to the Nixon Doctrine, where the US shifted to supporting allies with aid rather than direct military intervention, due to the war's unpopularity and cost."

Question 16 (2 marks)

What role did the United Nations play in the Suez Crisis of 1956?

Answer Framework: The UN played a key role by deploying its first peacekeeping force (UNEF) to supervise the withdrawal of British, French, and Israeli forces from Egypt and to maintain peace along the Suez Canal. This helped de-escalate the crisis and established a precedent for UN peacekeeping operations.

Marking Scheme:

  • 1 mark: Identifies a basic role. E.g., "It sent peacekeepers."
  • 2 marks: Explains the role with context. E.g., "The UN sent its first peacekeeping force to oversee the withdrawal of invading forces from Egypt, helping to resolve the crisis and setting a model for future peacekeeping."

Section E: Knowledge and Understanding Questions (10 marks)

Question 17 (2 marks)

Define the term "Iron Curtain" as used by Winston Churchill in 1946.

Answer Framework: The "Iron Curtain" referred to the ideological and physical division of Europe between the communist East (dominated by the USSR) and the democratic West. Churchill used the term to describe the Soviet Union's isolation of Eastern Europe behind a barrier of secrecy and control.

Marking Scheme:

  • 1 mark: Basic definition. E.g., "The division between East and West Europe."
  • 2 marks: Clear definition with context. E.g., "The 'Iron Curtain' was Churchill's term for the division of Europe into a Soviet-controlled communist East and a US-aligned democratic West, symbolising the start of the Cold War."

Question 18 (2 marks)

Identify two countries that were members of the Warsaw Pact.

Answer Framework: Any two from: Soviet Union, Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania (until 1968).

Marking Scheme:

  • 1 mark: One correct country.
  • 2 marks: Two correct countries.

Question 19 (2 marks)

State one consequence of the nuclear arms race for international relations.

Answer Framework: One consequence was the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), which created a balance of terror that prevented direct war between the superpowers but also maintained a constant state of tension and fear.

Marking Scheme:

  • 1 mark: Identifies a consequence. E.g., "It prevented direct war."
  • 2 marks: Explains the consequence. E.g., "The arms race led to MAD, where both sides knew a nuclear war would destroy both, so they avoided direct conflict but remained in a tense standoff."

Question 20 (4 marks)

Name the policy introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev that contributed to the end of the Cold War, and briefly explain its impact.

Answer Framework: Candidates may name either glasnost (openness) or perestroika (restructuring) or both.

  • Glasnost: Allowed greater freedom of speech and reduced censorship, which weakened the Communist Party's control and encouraged reform movements in Eastern Europe.
  • Perestroika: Economic restructuring that aimed to revive the Soviet economy but led to instability and loss of confidence in the communist system.

Impact: These policies reduced Soviet repression, encouraged Eastern European nations to break away from Soviet control (e.g., the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989), and ultimately led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, ending the Cold War.

Marking Scheme:

  • L1 (1-2 marks): Names a policy with a basic impact. E.g., "Glasnost allowed more freedom and helped end the Cold War."
  • L2 (3-4 marks): Names a policy and explains its impact with specific examples. E.g., "Gorbachev's policy of glasnost allowed greater openness and criticism of the government, which weakened communist control and inspired protests in Eastern Europe, leading to the fall of communist regimes and the end of the Cold War."

END OF ANSWER KEY