Primary 6 PSLE English Practice Paper 4

TuitionGoWhere Practice Paper — English Primary 6 PSLE

Answer Key — Grammar Focus (Version 4 of 5)

---

Section A: Grammar MCQ (10 marks)

1. Answer: (C) had studied / would get

Explanation: This is a mixed conditional sentence. The "if" clause refers to an unreal past condition (third conditional structure: "had studied"), and the result clause refers to a present consequence ("would get"). Option (B) would require a past result ("would have gotten"), which does not fit "now." Option (A) uses simple past, which is incorrect for an unreal past condition. Option (D) uses the wrong conditional structure entirely.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only.

---

2. Answer: (B) was completed

Explanation: The sentence describes a completed past action ("before the deadline yesterday") with a clear past time marker. The simple passive past tense ("was completed") is correct. Option (C) past perfect ("had been completed") would only be correct if another past event needed to be sequenced after it. Option (A) present perfect is incorrect with a specific past time reference. Option (D) present simple is incorrect.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only.

---

3. Answer: (C) are

Explanation: With "neither...nor," the verb agrees with the subject closest to it. "Employees" is plural, so the plural verb "are" is correct. The sentence refers to a present situation, so present tense is appropriate.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only. Common mistake: students choose "is" because they match "neither" with a singular verb, ignoring the proximity rule.

---

4. Answer: (B) had prepared

Explanation: The past perfect tense ("had prepared") is used to show that one past action was completed before another past action ("the guests arrived"). This is a classic past perfect usage. Option (C) past continuous suggests an ongoing action, which does not fit the meaning of completion before arrival.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only.

---

5. Answer: (A) boils

Explanation: When reporting a general truth or scientific fact, the present simple tense is retained even in reported speech. Water boiling at 100°C is a scientific fact, so "boils" is correct.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only. Common mistake: students backshift to "boiled" because of the past tense "explained."

---

6. Answer: (B) had been

Explanation: In reported speech, the past perfect ("had been") is used to backshift from the present perfect or simple past in direct speech. The original direct speech would have been "Where were you last evening?" or "Where have you been?" — both backshift to past perfect in reported speech.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only.

---

7. Answer: (C) which

Explanation: "Which" is the correct relative pronoun for non-restrictive (non-essential) clauses referring to things. The clause is set off by commas, indicating it is non-restrictive. "That" is not used in non-restrictive clauses. "Who" and "whom" refer to people, not projects.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only.

---

8. Answer: (B) did she pass

Explanation: When a sentence begins with "Not only," subject-auxiliary inversion is required. The auxiliary "did" must come before the subject "she." This is a formal grammar rule tested at PSLE level.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only. Common mistake: students choose (A) because they do not apply inversion after negative fronting.

---

9. Answer: (B) so / that

Explanation: The correct correlative structure is "so + adjective + that" to express result. "Such...that" requires a noun phrase after "such" (e.g., "such complicated instructions that"). "Too...that" is incorrect; the correct pair is "too...to." "Very...that" is not a standard correlative pair.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only.

---

10. Answer: (C) were

Explanation: In the second conditional (unreal present), "were" is used for all subjects, including "I," in formal and exam English. "If I were you" is the standard expression. While "was" is common in informal speech, "were" is the grammatically correct form expected in PSLE.

Marking note: Award 1 mark for the correct answer only. Accept "was" only if the marking scheme permits informal usage, but "were" is the preferred PSLE answer.

---

Section B: Grammar Editing and Transformation (15 marks)

11. Answer: "The children were playing in the park when it started to rain. They ran home but forgot their bags."

Explanation:

• "was" → "were": "Children" is plural and requires a plural verb.
• "start" → "started": The past simple is needed to match the past tense narrative ("was playing...when it started").
• "runs" → "ran": Past simple is required for consistency with the past tense narrative.
• "forgets" → "forgot": Past simple is required; the action of forgetting happened in the past.

Marking note: Award 3 marks if all four corrections are made correctly. Award 2 marks for three correct corrections. Award 1 mark for one or two correct corrections. Deduct 0.5 marks for each additional error introduced, minimum 0.

---

12. Answer: "All the returned books had already been shelved by the librarian before the students came to borrow them."

Explanation:

• The object of the active sentence ("all the returned books") becomes the subject of the passive sentence.
• The verb "had shelved" (past perfect active) becomes "had been shelved" (past perfect passive).
• The original subject ("the librarian") becomes the agent introduced by "by."
• The time clause ("before the students came to borrow them") remains unchanged.

Marking note: Award 3 marks for a fully correct passive transformation. Award 2 marks if the tense is correct but the agent or word order is slightly off. Award 1 mark if the student demonstrates understanding of passive voice but makes tense errors. The meaning must be preserved.

---

13. Answer: "The athlete who had trained for five years won a gold medal."

OR: "The athlete, who had trained for five years, won a gold medal."

Explanation:

• The relative pronoun "who" is used because "the athlete" is a person.
• The relative clause ("who had trained for five years") is embedded into the main clause to combine the two sentences.
• The past perfect ("had trained") correctly shows that the training occurred before winning the medal.
• Commas are optional here depending on whether the clause is treated as restrictive or non-restrictive.

Marking note: Award 3 marks for a correct combination with proper relative pronoun and tense. Award 2 marks if the relative pronoun is correct but the tense is wrong. Award 1 mark if the student attempts to combine the sentences but uses an incorrect structure. Accept either "who" or "that" for a restrictive clause.

---

14. Answer: The teacher said (that) we had to submit our essays by Friday or we would lose marks.

Explanation:

• "You" changes to "we" (or "they" depending on context; "we" is appropriate if the reporter is one of the students addressed).
• "Must" changes to "had to" in reported speech (obligation in the past).
• "Your" changes to "our" to match the change in person.
• "Will" changes to "would" (backshifting from present to past).
• The reporting verb "said" is in the past tense, so backshifting is required throughout.

Marking note: Award 3 marks for a fully correct reported speech transformation with all necessary changes. Award 2 marks if one or two changes are missed (e.g., "will" not backshifted). Award 1 mark if the student shows understanding of reported speech but makes multiple errors. Accept "told us that" as an alternative to "said that."

---

15. Answer: "Each of the students has their own textbook, but neither of them brought it to class yesterday."

Explanation:

• "Each" is singular, so the verb must be "has" (not "have").
• "Neither" is also singular. The verb must agree: "neither...brought."
• "Bring" must be changed to "brought" because "yesterday" indicates past tense.
• "Their" is acceptable in modern usage with "each" and "neither," though formally "his or her" may be preferred. At P6 level, "their" is widely accepted.

Marking note: Award 3 marks if both corrections are made correctly. Award 2 marks for one correct correction. Award 1 mark if the student identifies errors but corrects them incorrectly. Do not penalise "their" versus "his or her" at this level.

---

Section C: Grammar Cloze and Application (15 marks)

16. Answer: went

Explanation: The action happened "last Saturday," a specific past time, so the simple past tense "went" is required.

Marking note: Award 1 mark. Do not accept "have gone" or "had gone."

---

17. Answer: were told

Explanation: The students received the action (passive voice). Since the main narrative is in the past, the simple past passive "were told" is correct. "Were" agrees with the plural subject "they."

Marking note: Award 1 mark. Accept "had been told" only if the student can justify it as occurring before another past event, but "were told" is the expected answer.

---

18. Answer: were established

Explanation: The gardens received the action of being established (passive voice). The year 1859 is a completed past event, so simple past passive "were established" is correct. "Were" agrees with the plural subject "gardens."

Marking note: Award 1 mark. Do not accept "was established" (subject-verb agreement error).

---

19. Answer: have been recognised

Explanation: The phrase "since 2015" indicates an action that started in the past and continues to the present. The present perfect passive "have been recognised" is correct. "Have" agrees with the plural subject "gardens."

Marking note: Award 1 mark. Do not accept "had been recognised" (no past-before-past context) or "are recognised" (ignores "since").

---

20. Answer: had not visited

Explanation: The past perfect ("had not visited") is used to show that the students' not visiting occurred before the time of the learning journey (another past event). This is a classic past perfect usage for an action completed before another past action.

Marking note: Award 1 mark. Accept "had not been to" as an alternative, but "had not visited" is the expected answer.

---

21. Answer: to

Explanation: The infinitive of purpose "to raise" explains why the charity event was organised. This is a standard grammar structure: "organised + noun + to + verb (purpose)."

Marking note: Award 2 marks. Do not accept "for raise" or "for raising" (less standard in this context).

---

22. Answer: was held

Explanation: The event received the action (passive voice). The past simple passive "was held" is correct because the event happened "last month" (completed past). "Was" agrees with the singular subject "event."

Marking note: Award 2 marks. Do not accept "is held" (present tense) or "were held" (plural verb with singular subject).

---

23. Answer: which

Explanation: "Which" is the correct relative pronoun for a non-restrictive clause that refers back to the entire preceding clause ("I was asked to give a speech"). "That" cannot be used in non-restrictive clauses. "Who" refers to people, not situations.

Marking note: Award 2 marks. Do not accept "that" or "who."

---

24. Answer: had practised

Explanation: The past perfect ("had practised") is used because the practising occurred before the feeling of confidence, which is also in the past. This shows the correct sequencing of past events.

Marking note: Award 2 marks. Accept "practiced" (American spelling) as well as "practised" (British/Singapore spelling). Do not accept "have practised" or "was practising."

---

25. Answer: managed

Explanation: The simple past tense "managed" is correct because the action of raising money was completed in the past ("last month"). The entire passage is in the past tense, so consistency is required.

Marking note: Award 2 marks. Do not accept "have managed" or "had managed" (no past-before-past context needed here).

---

Summary of Marks

Section	Questions	Marks
A: Grammar MCQ	1–10	10
B: Grammar Editing & Transformation	11–15	15
C: Grammar Cloze & Application	16–25	15
Total		40

---

This practice paper is syllabus-aligned and generated for PSLE preparation purposes. It is not derived from any actual past-year examination paper.