From Real Exams Quiz
A Level H2 History Conflict International Relations Quiz
Free A Level H2 History Conflict IR quiz, HY3 Exam version, with questions, answers, and A Level-style practice for Singapore students.
These static practice materials are generated from the site's syllabus and paper-generation workflow, with source and model context shown so students and parents can evaluate the material before use.
Questions
Free quiz and exam paper access
Enter your details to view this paper
Your access is remembered on this device.
Answers
A-Level History H2 Quiz - Conflict International Relations (Answer Key)
Total Marks: 60
Section A: 55 marks (Q1–8)
Section B: 165 marks (Q9–14) — Note: essay questions carry high marks; cumulative quiz total exceeds 60 if all essays written. For quiz practice, mark per question as shown; duration caps completion to selected essays.
Section C: 16 marks (Q15–20)
Quiz design: 20 questions, mixed types. Essays (B) are extended; in a 75-min quiz, students attempt a subset. Marks shown per item.
Section A Answers
Q1. [10 marks] Compare Sources A and B on great-power consensus.
- Both sources agree that great-power consensus is necessary for UN action (A: US notes veto ties hands; B: Soviet notes action occurred when USA–USSR agreed). [2]
- Source A (1985, US ambassador) stresses that lack of consensus due to veto harms peace and US will block interference in its interests. [3]
- Source B (1991, Pravda) shows consensus achieved in Gulf War via US–USSR cooperation, presenting UN as functional when powers agree. [3]
- Difference: A sees consensus blocked by one power's veto; B sees consensus as achievable post-1989. Provenance: A is US state, B is Soviet media—bias shapes tone. [2]
Teaching note: Comparison requires joint treatment, not separate summary. Use "both… however…" structure.
Q2. [5 marks] Reliability of Source E (cartoon).
- Type: newspaper cartoon, Kenya 1994, contemporary satire. [1]
- Usefulness: high for showing perception that Security Council ignored Rwanda via veto. [2]
- Reliability: low for factual detail (cartoon exaggerates); reflects opinion not data. [2]
Mistake: calling cartoon "unreliable" outright—better: limited reliability, high usefulness for attitudes.
Q3. [10 marks] Using C and F on success.
- Source C: missions rose 5→17, troops 9k→38k post-1991 = more active. [3]
- Source F: more deployments but failures in civil wars show structural constraint. [3]
- Synthesis: quantitatively more successful, qualitatively limited by great-power caution. [4]
Concept: measure success by both scale and outcome.
Q4. [15 marks] How far Sources A–F support view that collective security undermined efforts 1985–1999.
- Support: A (veto ties hands), E (veto fence), D (slow adapt), F (caution limits). [6]
- Partial: C shows growth despite constraints. [3]
- Counter: B shows consensus enabled Gulf War. [3]
- Conclusion: moderate support; collective security both enabled (when consensus) and undermined (when veto). [3]
Marking: 3 marks per sourced point, 3 for synthesis.
Q5. [2 marks] Source D suggests structures built for bipolar world were slow to adapt.
- Answer: UN structures were slow to adapt to new crises. [2]
Q6. [3 marks] Limitation of Source B:
- It is a Soviet editorial celebrating one case (Gulf War); does not cover failures (Rwanda). [3]
Q7. [5 marks] A and E on veto impact:
- A: veto blocks council action; E: veto = inaction on Rwanda. [3]
- Both show responsiveness reduced by veto power. [2]
Q8. [5 marks] Source C alone proves effectiveness?
- No: more missions ≠ success; lacks outcome data. [3]
- Needs F or others for qualitative view. [2]
Section B Answers (Essay frameworks)
Q9. [30] Extent US caused UN failure 1985–95.
- Agree: veto use, blocking resolutions (Nicaragua, Lebanon). [8]
- Disagree: USSR veto pre-1991, Rwanda failure was council-wide. [8]
- Other factors: structural, financing. [8]
- Judgement: US major but not sole cause. [6]
Descriptors: L5 balanced, 3+ regions not needed (global topic).
Q10. [30] Cold War rivalries vs UN.
- Validate: veto paralysed council (Korean War bypass). [10]
- Counter: some cooperation (Congo 1960). [10]
- Conclusion: greatest challenge but not only. [10]
Q11. [30] Not prepared post-Cold War.
- Yes: Balkans, Rwanda showed mandate gap. [12]
- No: more peacekeeping authorised. [12]
- Synthesis. [6]
Q12. [30] Collective security undermined 1985–99.
- For: veto, great-power caution. [12]
- Against: Gulf War, expanded ops. [12]
- Weigh. [6]
Q13. [20] Secretary vs general.
- Secretary: administrative, Article 97. [10]
- General: moral voice (Hammarskjöld). [10]
Q14. [25] Great power vs operational.
- Great power: veto, interests. [10]
- Operational: logistics, mandates. [10]
- Judgement. [5]
Section C Answers
Q15. [2] Collective security: all states act together against aggression (UN Art 39–42).
Q16. [2] USA and USSR (or UK, France, China). Any two permanents.
Q17. [2] End of Cold War reduced veto deadlock / more crises emerged.
Q18. [2] Rwanda 1994 / Bosnia 1995.
Q19. [4] Truman Doctrine pledged US aid vs communism; intensified US–USSR divide, making Security Council consensus harder. [4]
Q20. [4] Traditionalist: Soviet expansionism caused Cold War. Post-revisionist: both sides contributed, misperception. [4]