From Real Exams Exam Paper
A Level H2 History Practice Paper 4
Free A Level H2 History Practice Paper 4, HY3 Exam version, with questions, answers, and A Level-style practice for Singapore students.
These static practice materials are generated from the site's syllabus and paper-generation workflow, with source and model context shown so students and parents can evaluate the material before use.
Questions
Free quiz and exam paper access
Enter your details to view this paper
Your access is remembered on this device.
Answers
TuitionGoWhere Exam Practice (AI) — History H2 A-Level
Practice Paper: Source Based Skills (Version 4) — Answer Key
Total Marks: 80
Teaching notes included for each question.
Section A Answers (28 marks)
Q1. [2 marks]
Answer: Source A uses "curtain of iron" (later popularised as "Iron Curtain") to mean a rigid political and ideological barrier separating Soviet-controlled Eastern Europe from the West.
Teaching note: Define metaphor: physical barrier = division. 1 mark for identifying division, 1 mark for linking to Soviet/West spheres.
Q2. [2 marks]
Answer: The Soviet Union viewed the Marshall Plan as a deceptive tool ("wolf in sheep's clothing") to bind European economies to US capitalist control.
Teaching note: 1 mark for "not genuine aid", 1 mark for "US economic domination".
Q3. [2 marks]
Answer: Both sources agree that the superpowers were creating separate blocs/dividing Europe (A: spheres of influence; B: separate socialist programme).
Teaching note: Must show explicit point from both. 1 mark each source.
Q4. [4 marks]
Answer: The cartoon shows a wall splitting Europe; USSR soldier = Eastern bloc ideology, US businessman = Western capitalism; labels show trade and ideology as divide. This illustrates bipolarity: two rival centres of power.
Marking: 2 marks for describing visual, 2 marks for linking to bipolar concept.
Teaching note: Image must show wall, two figures, labels. Bipolar = two dominant powers post-1945.
Q5. [4 marks]
Answer: Source A tone = alarmed/warning (British perspective); Source B tone = accusatory/defensive (Soviet). Both hostile but from opposing sides.
Marking: 2 marks per source tone analysis.
Q6. [6 marks]
Answer: Useful as it reflects elite/media British view; but limited as editorial not broad public survey, possible bias against USSR.
Marking: 3 marks reliability (author, date, bias), 3 marks usefulness (addresses question, limitations).
Teaching note: Reliability ≠ usefulness. Editorial = one viewpoint.
Q7. [8 marks]
Answer: Sources A and B show rivalry but A focuses on elections (political), B on economy (Marshall). Both imply aid/influence used as tools. Partial support.
Marking: 4 marks comparison, 4 marks evaluation of "how far".
Teaching note: Do not overstate; sources imply not explicitly state "tool".
Section A Total: 28
Section B Answers (28 marks)
Q8. [2 marks]
Answer: USSR defence spending rose 1980–85 then fell sharply by 1989 (17% to 11% GNP).
Teaching note: 1 mark trend up, 1 mark down.
Q9. [2 marks]
Answer: US strength and resolve forced Soviets to negotiate (Reagan's view).
Teaching note: Attribute to Source E.
Q10. [4 marks]
Answer: D credits Gorbachev/USSR; E credits US pressure. Directly contradictory on agency.
Marking: 2 marks each source view.
Q11. [6 marks]
Answer: Reliable as contemporary worker voice; but leaflet is advocacy, may exaggerate. Useful for grassroots perspective missing in elite sources.
Marking: 3 reliability, 3 usefulness.
Q12. [6 marks]
Answer: D and E conflict (USSR vs USA); H synthesises all. Moderate agreement only on multi-causality.
Marking: 2 D, 2 E, 2 H.
Q13. [4 marks]
Answer: F shows quantitative strain; H gives interpretation. Stats show burden, historiography explains meaning.
Marking: 2 each.
Q14. [4 marks]
Answer: D strongly supports; E contradicts; G/H qualify. Limited to moderate support for "primarily".
Marking: 1 per source group, 1 synthesis.
Section B Total: 28
Section C Answers (24 marks)
Q15. [2 marks]
Answer: Provenance = source origin (author, date, purpose).
Teaching note: 1 mark definition, 1 mark elements.
Q16. [4 marks]
Answer: Primary may be biased/partial; secondary can synthesise evidence. Reliability depends on context not type.
Marking: 2 each point.
Q17. [4 marks]
Answer: (1) Do they describe same event similarly? (2) Are there conflicting interests?
Marking: 2 per question.
Q18. [4 marks]
Answer: Warsaw Pact line hits 0 in 1991 = bloc dissolved, bipolar order ended. NATO stable.
Teaching note: Use graph values: WP 1991=0.
Q19. [4 marks]
Answer: (1) Compulsory source case study on Cold War; (2) Sub-questions compare and test assertion.
Marking: 2 each.
Q20. [6 marks]
Answer: (1) Date/context of 1962 superpower tension; (2) Author (JFK/Khrushchev) position.
Marking: 3 each.
Section C Total: 24
Paper Total: 80

